OK, so since when has Obama's NDAA stance mattered to this website? I thought it was a nothing issue.
Jim thinks it's important. I don't. He's co-editor. He leans more Ron Paulish than I do. We have a variety of views from the libertarian Republican spectrum here at LR. I'd rather see Nader come out against seat belt laws. 1,000 times more important on my scale.
What Eric said. For the record, I am registered as a libertarian and I don't like the NDAA, Patriot Act, TSA and DHS.
Jim is right: NDAA, the abolishing of the writ against habeaus corpus is big.yours trulyAlan Turin
Okay, great. Jim is right. Now when is Nader going to get around to opposing seat belt laws and lowering the drinking age? Then, I'll be impressed.
I feel the same way about the ACLU and the second amendment.
Post a Comment