Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Libertarian Republican, Joe Newby story on Houston Dem Pct. Chair calling for NRA members to be shot, sparks investigative piece on local ABC TV News

Texas Democrat Party spokesman issues official statement distancing themselves from the offensive Tweet

From Eric Dondero:

Our friend and libertarian Republican reporter Joe Newby first broke the story, with some help from blogger Jolly Politics and Michelle Malkin's We picked it up hours later, and added some critical information. Then we alerted Michael Berry at KTRH 740-AM Houston. Michael is a firebrand wholly politically incorrect "Ron Paul constitutionalist" redneck libertarian. His show is syndicated nationwide, including San Antonio, Albany, NY, Louisiana, and Portland, OR. Berry talked about it on air for 10 minutes.

We then tipped off some right media. picked it up, as well as PJ Media, and a whole slew of conservative and NRA-oriented blogs.

And now this.

As Newby and KTRK both note, the TX Democrat Party has issued a statement distancing themselves from the Tweet from their own Exec. Comm. mbr John Carburruvias:
"The Democratic Party never condones violence in our society," the state Party told Examiner in an email, and told KTRK that "everyone wishes they could take back something they've said."
But as Joe remarks at TheExaminer:
No doubt, if a Republican issued a tweet that suggested supporters of a liberal cause be shot, the entire Democrat-media complex would be calling for blood until the offender resigned.


Chuck said...

Funny how none of these animals had anything to say about Fort Hood. I don't recall a single leftist dickhole bemoaning 2nd amendment civil rights when some proud Satan worshiper went ape-shit on his unarmed victims.

Instead I was told to ignore it by these same outraged vermin. For purely political reasons. Democrat party reasons. Leftist reasons.

Fuck them. Forever. They are the scum of this earth.

The Right Guy said...

What a liberal and marxist jew I know sent to me in response to the ACLU being hypocrites vis a vis the second amendment:

Besides, the ACLU website says:

"Given the reference to 'a well regulated Militia' and 'the security of a free State,' the ACLU has long taken the position that the Second Amendment protects a collective right rather than an individual right. For seven decades, the Supreme Court's 1939 decision in United States v. Miller was widely understood to have endorsed that view.

"The Supreme Court has now ruled otherwise. In striking down Washington D.C.'s handgun ban by a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in D.C. v. Heller held for the first time that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, whether or not associated with a state militia.

"The ACLU disagrees with the Supreme Court's conclusion about the nature of the right protected by the Second Amendment. We do not, however, take a position on gun control itself. In our view, neither the possession of guns nor the regulation of guns raises a civil liberties issue."

Erich Domdero said...

You guys are so hilarious.