
Newsletter scandal boosts Paul's support among Dems from 59% to 70%From Eric Dondero:
Ron Paul has received a great deal of negative publicity in the last week over what many have termed are racist and homo-phobic comments he made in the early 1990s, in various newsletters under his name. But that doesn't seem to have hurt his standing with members of the Democrat Party. David Weigel, formerly with Reason magazine, reports over at Slate:
If Ron Paul was suffering and taking damage from... his old newsletters, what sort of voters would... be offended by signed editorials about fleet-footed blacks and skeezy gay men... you'd expect independents, Democrats and liberals, the people boosting Paul in Iowa and New Hampshire, to react the most negatively.But according to Public Policy Polling's newest numbers (PPP), last week:
The numbers from last week indicate that Republican support has slipped, but Democrats for Paul have soared:
Meanwhile, political analyst John Hayward of the conservative Human Events reports on a new poll from Ask America of 889 likely GOP caucus voters. In it, Mitt Romney leads the poll with 24%, followed by Rick Santorum at 17%, Ron Paul 14%, and Newt Gingrich at 13%.Hayward:
the remarkable news... Rick Santorum has muscled into second place, while former Iowa frontrunner Ron Paul has fallen into thirdHe notes interestingly:
Paul also benefits from a good deal of “Operation Chaos”-type support from Democrats who have absolutely no intention of voting for him over Obama in the general election, and might lose interest in him as a vehicle for future open-primary meddling if he can’t manage a strong Iowa finish. Since Obama faces no primary challenge, there will be lots of Democrats in open-primary states with time on their hands this year.

19 comments:
God I want to see the most anti-Libertarian Rick Santorum do well and just see Eric cuddle up to him. Santorum would ban porn, alcohol, music and TV if he had his way. But war mongers love each other, libertarianism details damned.
Warmongerism on Islamo-Fascism IS libertarianism. You forgot that one minor little detail.
Besides what good does porn, alcohol and music do if we've all had our throats slit by the Islamists?
You cannot have liberty without a defense against Islamism. Quite simple actually.
Eric is confused. Non-interventionism = libertarianism.
The Democrats flocking to Ron Paul is no par w/the flocking to him by independents.
It's how one wins the presidency.
Let's say it now: President of the United States of American, Dr. Ron Paul of Texas.
Beautiful.
yours for liberty
Alan Turin
Here's a scenario: Democrats all vote for Ron Paul. And Republicans vote for a Republican. Simple.
That would be a win win situation.
Eric, you used to work for Ron Paul. He's defeated liberal Democrats. He's defeated big government Republicans.
You KNOW he's no leftist. But you keep lying about that.
Thanks. By being anti-Paul, you establish Ron as better man.
Ron Paul for President
Alan Turin
PS
Who do you think Ron would appoint as RNC chairman after he's sworn in?
ART
"Who do you think Ron would appoint as RNC chairman after he's sworn in?"
Either Batman or the Easter Bunny.
Paul is the only constitutional conservative that understands liberty running. Perhaps Paul has a strong liberal streak . As in Classical Liberalism. You know Eric, sorta like the founders don't ya know?
Pope Ron Paul is our only hope!
Others run, but Pope Ron Paul ascends! The golden light that glows from the Good Doctor's divine butthole is our gateway to a better life.
Get in line. Feel it.
The glory hole to another dimension?
Gee. I wonder why actual republicans don't support Pope Ron Paul? Oh that's right, they support republicans instead. Go figure.
Yeah, Republicans like Mitt Romney ("I was an independent when Reagan was President"). Makes perfect sense.
30 fucking years ago? That's the standard?
Dan:
In two to three weeks, this game will be all but over. 3-4 of the current crop will be out. If I was a betting man, I bet on Romney at this point. That said, quit yer bitching and lets get on the "let's get rid of oBama" train. Any of the GOP candidates would be an improvement at this point. Obamy has had a free ride with all the attention on the GOP. It's time to refocus.
Jim, I wouldn't vote for Romney if my life depended on it. I'd rather see Obama get reelected. I guess I'm just not a "real Republican" because I'm not drinking the Kool Aid. We don't elect the President anyway, the electoral college does.
Would you really want Obama reelected?
Spite.
Makes right?
Post a Comment