Includes language to Protect Tax Exempt for Churches, Right to AssociationFrom Eric Dondero:
We reported here at LR on Saturday "Gay Marriage problematic for Catholic Churches - May lose Tax Exempt status":
The New York State Senate is set to vote on a Gay Marriage proposal next week; one of Gov. Cuomo's top priorities. NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg has also been pushing the bill.
One huge sticky point. Passage of the Bill will almost certainly mean Catholic Churches throughout NYC and the State will lose their tax exempt status.
New York's leading libertarian Republican Senator Greg Ball (who has been featured here at LR many times in the past), is desperately trying to work out a last minute compromise...
Now, new news breaking that is being very under-reported by the mainstream media. There has been a major last minute change to the legislation. Governor Andrew Cuomo may now have the votes he needs to pass the bill. However, it took the inclusion of an explicit clause guaranteeing the rights of Catholic Churches and other entities, to refuse to perform gay marriage ceremonies, to get it passed.
The NY Daily News reports:
The bill also specifies that no clergy would be forced to perform gay marriage ceremonies.Here's a summary of the language from Capitol Confidential (Albany) "Cuomo intros same-sex marriage, noting exemptions":
Senator Ball is credited with bringing about the change.An entity incorporated under the benevolent orders and other organizations formed by religious orders “shall be deemed in its nature distinctly private and therefore, shall not be required to provide accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges related to the solemnization or celebration of a marriage.” In other words, the Knights of Columbus or the Jonesville Hunting Club (which as a Jonesville native I assure you doesn’t actually exist, but you get my point) can continue to only rent their hall to members, and they, like the Boy Scouts and other private organizations, can set the criteria for membership.
– Such a refusal “shall not create a civil claim or cause of action.” Which means, if you’re a gay couple just dying to get married in the Knights of Columbus catering hall, you can’t sue them if they say no.
The Cuomonian language, which was blessed yesterday by gay rights advocates, seems aimed at Republican senators like Sen. Greg Ball, R-Putnam County. It’s unclear whether Ball will be swayed.Note - outside of Capitol Confidential virtually no media, New York or nationally, is reporting this as a concession on the legislation by Cuomo.
Photo credit - DNAinfo.com

5 comments:
This is the second time you've brought up the "tax exempt status" thing -- and once again, none of the articles you cite/link mention tax-exempt status at all.
Are you genuinely ignorant of the fact that "exemption" has multiple meanings, or are you just lying like you did in Maine?
I didn't know Eric was a lawyer?
RightGuy,
One need not be a lawyer to understand that "exempt" and "exemption" can apply to things besides taxes.
For example, Congress is "exempt" from inspection/regulation by OSHA (among many other things).
The questions these articles seem to be addressing are:
1) Will churches be exempt from the non-discrimination laws when it comes to hiring, "public accommodations," etc.? Naturally I agree they should be (and that everyone else should be, too).
2) Will churches be exempt from anti-discrimination requirements related to receiving government handouts? I'd rather eliminate the handouts entirely, but if the handouts remain, I'd say no, they should be exempt.
If they want government money to run an adoption service, for example, they shouldn't get to reject same-sex couples as adoptive parents. They can have their imaginary friend's approval, or they can have my tax money, but if there's a conflict between the two, they have to choose one or the other.
I said lawyer because you said Eric was basically a liar for hire. Lawyers are liars for hire...I guess my humor was too subtle and dry.
I think that businesses/churches/privately owned clubs should put up a sign stating their discrimination choices. You know like, "Heterosexuals Only." That way people can choose to take their business somewhere else. If 48% of the population thinks discrimination of this kind is wrong, then they will lose 48% of their business. Capitalism in action. Conversely, other orgahizations could post their anti-discrimination policies.
Post a Comment