Should Americans have the right to build a Church or Synagogue at Mecca?by Wayne Allyn Root
As one of America's leading Libertarian thinkers, perhaps I'm always expected to give the "Libertarian answer" to every issue. But sometimes one has to speak not as a Libertarian, Republican or Democrat, but rather as an American- preferably a common sense American. The issue of allowing a mosque to be built in the shadow of the 9/11 terrorist tragedy is one of those times.
The answer is simple for a common sense American- I support religious freedom, as all Americans should. But this is not a case of religious freedom. Yes, Muslims can build their mosque virtually anywhere in America- despite 9/11...despite the Times Square bomber...despite plots by Islamic extremists to blow up the New York subway system...despite everything happening in Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan. That's what makes our country great. We do in fact support religious freedom. You can build a mosque virtually anywhere in America.
However, there are also the rights and sensibilities of others to consider in a free society.
Does "religious freedom" mean hate groups should build statues to Hitler in front of Jewish temples in America? Should Americans raise money to build Jewish temples and Christian churches at Mecca? Should Japan build a statue to the bravery of their pilots at Pearl Harbor? Should the U.S. build a statue to the bravery of our pilots at the site of Hiroshima? Aren't those examples all about "freedom of expression," "religious freedom" and property rights? Perhaps, but is it too much to ask for a little consideration and respect toward others?
This proposed building of a mosque on hallowed ground is an ATROSITY towards America. To build a celebration of Islam within steps of 9/11 does nothing to increase religious freedom...it inspires hatred, divides our cultures, and increases the odds of violence and hate crimes. Common sense suggests this mosque, being built in this specific location, is NOT being built as a sign of friendship between Muslims and Americans...but rather as a sign of the lack of respect...a belief in our weakness...and an attempt to embarrass and belittle us. The financial district of Manhattan is not a residential area with a large number of Muslim residents for the mosque to serve. Therefore common sense suggests that the only possible reason to build it there (rather than in Brooklyn or Queens where there are large Muslim populations) is to show Muslim contempt for Americans by building a monument to Islam in the shadow of the site of their greatest triumph over America.Privately funded or backed by Foreign Governments?
It is an offense to build a mosque in that location- an offense to all Americans (including Muslim Americans), all Christians and Jews, all relatives of 3000 dead heroes at the World Trade Center.
Yes, private individuals and organizations have the right to build houses of worship with their own funds. But one has to wonder where the money is coming from to build a 15-story building on some of the most expensive real estate in the country. We Americans believe in the separation of Church and State. If it turns out that this project is sponsored by a foreign government -- either directly or through a state-sponsored organization that engages in terrorism -- than the idea of this being an issue of religious freedom is a sham and an argument can be made that our Constitution would actually prohibit this mosque from being built.
However, if this is privately funded by parties with no ties to a foreign government, I have to believe that we have enough people in this country who are offended by the prospect of a mosque at Ground Zero, that the money can be raised to buy this land at a fair price from the owners. I know I'd be the first to contribute to a foundation to keep this sacred land from ever being desecrated by a symbol of the very groups that attacked America on 9/11.
We can also put public pressure on the property owners to sell to this new patriotic foundation funded by Americans. We can organize massive protests, filling the streets surrounding this property with patriotic Americans concerned that the hallowed ground of 9/11never be used as a political tool to taunt or embarrass the United States, or as a place to preach intolerance towards Americans. I, for one, am ready to fly 3000 miles to New York to join the protest.
These are the only rational answers for common sense patriotic Americans who still believe in a free society. In situations like this, none of us can afford to be Libertarians, Republicans, Democrats, or politicians of any stripe. We are all proud Americans.
Editor's Note - Wayne Root was the 2008 Libertarian Vice-Presidential candidate. He is currently an At-Large Member of the Libertarian National Committee, and Chair of the Libertarian Committee for Congressional candidates.
15 comments:
"As one of America's leading Libertarian thinkers"
lols.
What is meant by "lols", Scott?
Building a Mosque there is a deliberate insult to the locals, but that is nothing new in history.
The Greeks would take over lands and build a Temple to Aphrodite. The Romans built Temples to Jupiter. The Spanish did Catholic Churches over the corpses of Aztecs and Mayas. The British built Protestant churches in "pagan" lands of Africa or Asia.
It is all about lifting your leg doggy style and marking your territory. This is not a Moslem only thing.
No Gary... Today it is unique to Islam.
As for Protestant churches in Africa and Asia, your comparison is as ignorant as it is specious. (S-p-e-c-i-o-u-s. Go look it up.)
Ran,
Do you mean to tell me that 19th Century Protestant evangelicals like Dr. David Livingstone did not exist? That they did not try to convert the "pagans"? You are in la-la land.
And there you go. All of man's history has no meaning. Only Moslems do this. I guess the migration of Jews to Palestine and the massive building program of Temples on land that had belonged to Moslems and Christians does not count.
What a fantasy world you live in.
An additional thought using my great Golden State of California as the example.
No one gave a damn about the California Indian tribes, their religion or their "feelings".
The Russians marched in from Alaska building their Orthodox Churches. The Spanish marched in from the South building their Catholic Churches. The Americans marched in from the east building their Protestant churches.
None of them asked permission. They did not care about your "feelings". They built on the land of other peoples.
What sort of demented piece of shit thinks anything that happened in the 19th century is relevant in any way? What a loaf of shit you are.
Chuck,
I know this is hard for you to understand, but human nature does not change. The only thing that changes is the characters in the play.
Chuck, Gary is indeed so full of shit.
"lifting your leg doggy style and marking your territory" = Western values, technology and medicines, system of Law, education and schools... you know, the fundamentals of LIBERTY.
Gary, nice pumps. Matches your blush. Your mom's again?
technology and medicines, system of Law, education and schools. . . .
All in place in China or Egypt when Europeans were grunting and wearing blue paint.
"All in place in China or Egypt when Europeans were grunting and wearing blue paint."
*Pure* leftist bullshit. China at it's best pre-20th century was primarily a coastal phenomenon, and that due mostly to Western trade. Didn't begin to drag it's sorry, feudal, iron-age ass up from the muck until Christian missionaries arrived. Mao imported Western ideologies wholesale.
Try again.
As for the mosque at ground zero, the idea sucks as bad as Gary's grasp of history.
"Gary",
Why not instead of writing about current events, just find what you imagine to be similar in the passages of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales? It would be fun for you and further cement your well earned reputation as a circus clown.
I'm glad that Wayne never crossed the boundaries of property rights. These Muslims have purchased the land there, fair and square. It is their property to do with what they wish. If we oppose them building a mosque, let's speak out or try to buy the land back from them, but let's not try to use the power of government to stop them from building a mosque.
Josiah is on the money. Moreover, why didn't someone try to buy before this happened? Using eminent domain would be hypocritical.
Any means necessary would be reasonable self defense. Western Civilization isn't a suicide pact.
Not to serious grownups anyway.
Were this a monument to child molestation bought by a bunch of child molesters trying to make a political point about the righteousness of child molestation, no one would be making the retarded fucking arguments they are now making in defense of this proposed celebration of mass murder.
This sort of demented stupidity can only be learned.
God help us.
Post a Comment