"Leftist Asshole" interupts her Birthday party From Eric Dondero:
Fireworks erupted at the Birthday Party of Kristin Davis, Anti-Prohibtion Party candidate for New York Governor, last Saturday night.
Davis interupted her prepared remarks to make a special statement on the Muslim Mosque at Ground Zero controversy.
"If I can ask you to be serious for one minute in a night which is supposed to be a party I want to talk about something I feel very, very strongly about- I do not want a Mosque built near the 9/11 sight. I think it is wrong and would be held up as an important propaganda victory by radical extremist Islamics. The people of New York, the families of those murdered oppose this monument to the attack on this country."Semi-nude Models and Marijuana leaves
The event took place at the Lounge 49 Grove in Manhattan. About 40 guests were in attendance including celebrities, former escorts, and supporters of her candidacy.
As the blog BlaysianBitch describes:
Partygoers were greeted with semi nude models decorated with Davis’ name as well as marijuana leaves. Campaign workers made rounds asking everyone registered to vote in New York State to sign a petition.Then a heckler interrupted. Continuing:
The crowd cheered after the madam condemned the proposal until a man in the audience, later identified as Scott Pellegrino, challenged her.Afterwards, Pelligrino said:
Pellegrino, who came in support Davis asked, “ Are you saying the people who are trying to start the mosque blew up the buildings?” He was met with jeers from the crowd...
Davis responded that building the mosque would “send a message to the terrorists who decimated the city that its ‘okay’ and I don’t want it there.”
“I was extremely upset to hear her crazy, right-wing, racist view on the mosque. She seemed to collectively blame all Muslims, I tried to clarify.”Reached by Libertarian Republican for a comment, Davis Campaign Consultant Roger Stone, said of Pelligrino, he's a "fucking leftist asshole."
Davis will be a guest on LR's "Libertarian Politics Live" tonight at 8pm cst to discuss the spat at her birthday party and the issue of the Muslim Mosque at Ground Zero.
20 Bloviations:
He is right though. By not allowing those humans to use their private property in the way which they desire, you are blaming them for a crime which they did not commit. There is no way around this from a libertarian perspective.
"There is no way around this from a libertarian perspective."
Only to a retard. For the sane among us, there is nothing untoward about "humans" preventing a glaring monument to a barbaric death cult from being built on the site of one of it's greatest acts of mass murder.
Try again, dipshit.
First things first: There IS no proposed "mosque."
There's a proposed Islamic cultural center, which is no more a mosque than a YMCA is a cathedral or a Jewish cultural center is a synagogue.
Second thing: I never, ever thought I'd be happy to have seen a Republican nominated by the Libertarian Party, and I wasn't at first, but I am now.
Thank whatever deity may exist for the LPNY choosing Warren Redlich -- who supports religious freedom and private property rights in this matter -- over Davis, who has aligned herself with evil and fascism.
Knapp is right. It isn't really a proposed "Mosque." It's more like an Islamic Terrorist Center; a center for them to plan further attacks on the United States, and where Islamic extremists will join together to plot the destruction of our Nation.
Like a broken clock Knapp gets it right twice a day.
Is Pearl Harbor "private property"?
How about the Battlefield at Gettysburg?
Maybe Lexington & Concord in Mass?
Southern Manhattan around the former World Trade Center is the site of the very worst attack on the United States of America in our history. It is an historic battlefield. Calling it "private property" after 9/11 is a real stretch.
Eric,
Thanks for the admission that you believe private property magically becomes private property if its use offends your religious beliefs and/or if it happens to be located several blocks from the scene of a crime.
Between your opposition to private property and freedom of religion, your support for marriage apartheid, your claim that imaginary lines drawn on the ground by street gangs define nations, your call to make it legal to assault people who make use of pieces of cloth they own in ways you don't like, etc., it's reasonable to maintain that you're an amoral/schizoid conservative, not a libertarian.
Add your support for a hard-left Trotskyite foreign policy, and that puts the "neo" in front of "conservative."
You've been far enough and long enough now outside anything resembling libertarianism that you should probably quit pretending already.
Fucking halfwit.
it's no different than opposing the construction of a crack-pipe and dildo emporium across the street from an elementary school.
Of course, a demented piece of shit like you would be in full support of that as well.
Cultural suicide is what passes for "ethics" in the perverted minds of extremist shitbags like you. What a sad waste of a life.
Chuck,
Is the "fucking halfwit" caption next to your picture something new? I don't usually see it there, but I agree that it's helpful in understanding the type of stuff that comes after.
Lies followed by hype constitute a pretty good reason to believe that you know you don't have an argument.
Yes, mosques are traditionally built at the sites of Islamic military triumphs.
This isn't a mosque, it's a cultural center.
This isn't at Ground Zero, it's four blocks away.
Of course, even if it was a mosque, that wouldn't change the fact that it's being built with private funds on private property and is therefore nobody's fucking business except that of the funders/owners.
But we really don't have to get that far. The project's opponents are lying sacks of shit, which is all anyone really needs to know in order to provisionally dismiss their claims.
Knapp is right in one sense; this is not a "Mosque," per se. It's more of an Islamic Terrorist Training Center. Pamela Geller has all the details.
This is the incursion they've been wanting for years, right in the heart of New York City.
Think of it as a Nazi-type enclave in the heart of London circa 1939.
If we let this happen, we deserve our fate.
Hmmn, a Newbie to our Libertarian Movement like Tom Knapp, who joined the LP in the late 1990s, calling me a 25+ Year Member of the Libertarian Party, and former Libertarian National Comm. member 1985/86, calling me a "non-Libertarian."
Hey wet-behind-the-ears dude, try collecting 6,500 signatures for Libertarian Party ballot access in Illinois first, before you start launching assaults that so-and-so is "not a real Libertarian."
Actions speak louder than stupid-ass on-line rants.
Hell, you couldn't even take the time to shuffle a couple Libertarian petitioners to Metro-East, Illinois when we Libertarians begged you to help in 2006.
You were AWOL.
You should learn to read, Knippler.
Not that it's relevant in any way, but you won't find the word "mosque" in anything I wrote.
Islam is a death cult and should be treated as such by sensible people.
You fuckers are pathetic. You live in a dream world. Your entire existence is an exercise in masturbation. I pity anyone who has to spend time with you.
Redlich extols the virtues of sex with teen-age girls ! The Man's a perv! Lock up your under-age daughters!
Who gives a shit what this sicko thinks about a Mosque near ground zero- 70 % chance Redlich is arrested for child molestation before the election.
The guy hangs out outside elementary schools and sniffs bicycle seats. This is who the Libertarians picked.
I have to say that for the most part Tom is right in that if we believe in property rights for the individual and we believe in keeping the government out of our business in regards to property (eminent domain anyone?), then isn't it hypocritical to decry government intervention when it suits us? While I don't like Islam one bit and do think the muslims are sticking it in our eye, If they have the money and the property is zoned for such usage, should we use the government to prevent them from exercising their rights?
As far as Kristin Davis goes, we pretty much disagree on enough issues that I wouldn't support her, and that's from first hand accounts. Reading Ayn Rand in a jail cell doesn't make someone a good governor(or a bad one).
And to Chuck:
Bint's back. :)
"Hmmn, a Newbie to our Libertarian Movement"
It's not "our" Libertarian Movement. You left the movement when you gave up libertarianism for schizo-conservatism. How long I have been that which you no longer are is irrelevant.
"Hey wet-behind-the-ears dude, try collecting 6,500 signatures for Libertarian Party ballot access in Illinois first"
I'll take that seriously after I hear the Illinois LP bragging about how you refunded the money they paid you for collecting those signatures.
Working for the highest bidder isn't an indicator of ideology. You've also collected signatures for anti-libertarian candidates like Joe Lieberman and anti-libertarian public policy measures like the bill to reinstate marriage apartheid in Maine.
"Actions speak louder than stupid-ass on-line rants."
Yes, they do
"Hell, you couldn't even take the time to shuffle a couple Libertarian petitioners to Metro-East, Illinois when we Libertarians begged you to help in 2006.
"You were AWOL."
Back that lie again eh?
"If they have the money and the property is zoned for such usage, should we use the government to prevent them from exercising their rights?"
Only if it's an electric dildo and crack pipe emporium across the street from an elementary school. If they're just selling crack to the school staff, they should be left alone.
And those places aren't zoned for that and can't be there.
How the hell would you know what places are zoned for what when it's a hypothetical?
You should never let your desire to feel like you're winning an argument outpace your ability to reason. If you have no objective other than simple truth, that will never happen.
Yours in earnest,
CHU
Chuck, anyone that is doing a project such as that has to do it within zoning laws. Whether it's a church, mosque, corporation or house. Furthermore, if there are issues such that what they want to do is outside what the area is zoned for, they have to apply for a variance. I don't know the local zoning laws to NYC in regards to cultural centers, but I imagine that it's within hoyle's rules so to speak. To close, my mom was a paralegal that specialized in zoning law, variances and other things likes COs and CCs, so I hope I can speak with a little clarity. If I need further elucidation, I'll consult my brother who is a building inspector in that region.
Ahh... Elucidation. It's what everyone desperately wants.
My mom is a nurse. I suppose that means something to a specimen such as yopurself.
The difference is that my mom was self-employed and I spent a lot of time with her on jobs.
Post a Comment