Home | About | Forums | Links | Contact | LR Blog | LR International | Video | RSS
Daily e-mail updates from
Libertarian Republican.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Progressives, Marijuana Reform advocates outraged over Obama's turn on Pot Legalization

by Eric Dondero

This is just too funny for words. The Cultural Left has gotten smacked down in the first few days of the Obama administration by one of "their own." And now they're standing around with their hands up in the air asking themselvs and others, "why... just why... did he do this?"

A few days into the new Administration, Obama's DEA raided Medicinal Marijuana facilities throughout southern California and arrested 4 individuals on federal charges of intent to distribute. These facilities are completely legal under California law, and have the full protection of the State, including support of Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

From a libertarian perspective this is a double-whammy: Through this action, Obama has signaled that his administration would not be a friend of legalization, even for medicinal use, but worse, that he has little if any respect for the concept of States' Rights. It calls into question, what will his DEA be doing in the other 10 states in the Nation that have also decriminalized medicinal marijuana, most recently in the 2008 election, Michigan and Massachusetts, by overwhelming majorities.

Obama: The ultimate Authoritarian Democrat

We libertarians, especially libertarian Republicans, have been screaming at the cultural left for months now that Obama was no friend of civil liberties. Outside of abortion rights, and gay rights, Obama is a cultural authoritarian, most especially on issues such as seat belt laws, 55 mph speed limit, gambling, free speech rights, affirmative action quotas, gun ownership and smoking bans. Why should any civil liberties advocate expect anything different from him on marijuana reform?

But support him they did. Some of the loudest supporters for Obama, and some of the loudest critics of the Republican ticket were on the cultural Left, specifically within the Marijuana Reform movement; like Rolling Stones Mag., Bill Mahr, Marc Scott Emery, and Ron Chusid. This despite the fact, that Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin was moderately supportive of marijuana reform in Alaska for years. She chummied up to the Alaska Libertarian Party, known in the State for being the Number One advocate for legalization. She even caught hell for that stance from Alaska social conservatives in her '06 primary run. And the Governor admitted herself to being a past marijuana smoker.

Now we have befuddlement and even hints of betrayal coming from the Marijuana Reform movement.

As a side note, the following editorial (excerpt) breaks new news. NORML reports that it was not only California that had raids by Obama's DEA, but Colorado, as well.

NORML hurt and confused by Obama's Marijuana stance

From Paul Armentano, Director National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), AlterNet, Jan. 28:

Marijuana Reform Is Part of the Progressive Agenda, So Why Are Obama's Drug Cops Already Making Pot Raids?

Pot-reform activists have swarmed Obama's Change.gov, and huge majorities voted for pot reform in election '08, but no change yet from Obama.

In response to the Change.gov poll, the administration posted a curt, one-sentence response, "President Obama is not in favor of the legalization of marijuana"... [Note also] as a candidate for president, Obama renounced his support for decriminalization...

Less expected, however, were the actions of the Justice Department last week when U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration officials raided the office of a California medical marijuana provider, as well as two medical grow houses in Colorado. (The possession of marijuana for medical purposes is legal in both states, and nonprofit organizations may legally dispense marijuana to authorized patients under California law.)

The busts outraged many drug-law-reform advocates... Many news outlets also were quick to voice criticism toward the new administration for continuing with the federal raids, noting that these aggressive actions possess little to no public support.

Rather than ignore the public's calls for drug-policy reform, the new administration ought to be embracing it. After all, many of the same voters that put Barack Obama in the White House also voted by wide margins in November to liberalize marijuana laws in two states -- Michigan and Massachusetts -- and in nearly a dozen municipalities nationwide.
Republicans better friends for Marijuana Reform advocates than Nanny-State Dems

It's going to be tough medicine to take for Marijuana Reform advocates in the next few months and years, for them to realize that Democrats, most especially authoritarian Democrat Obama, is no friend to the Marijuana Reform Movement. Rather, Republicans are much more open to their stance, particularly from the States Rights' angle, than big government Nanny-Stater Dems. Recall that it's Democrats who want to nationalize Health Care and will see marijuna legalization as running counter to their cost cutting efforts to regulate healthier lifestyles for individuals. Further, their prohibitionist efforts on tobacco smoking bans should serve as a dire warning to marijuana advocates.

And Marijuana Reform advocates cannot ignore the fact, that a number of libertarian-leaning Republicans, who are record in support of a States' Rights position on medical marijuana, were elected to Congress in 2008, like California's Tom McClintock. They've already had good friends on the GOP side of the aisle, for years now, like Congressmen Dana Rohrabacher, Pete Hoekstra, Jeff Flake and Ron Paul.

But for now, we libertarians who've recognized this from the start, can just sit back and have a chuckle at their naiivate'.

LINKS

This article received a major link this morning from Reddit.

18 comments:

Suzette Watkins said...

Come on Obama........not politics as usual again!

Anonymous said...

Are you kidding me? Republicans are not more friendly to this movement. Nixon, Reagan, and both Bushes, have escalated and even started this War.

Of course that doesn't excuse Clinton or Obama, but to say that the Republicans (McCain or Palin) would have been more friendly to this movement is laughable, and completely false.

Face it. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have the balls to fix this catastrophe. They are both complicit and are too vain to admit their mistakes.

Eric Dondero said...

Who are the two strongest advocates in the United States Congress right now for Marijuana legalization??

Dana Rohrabacher and Ron Paul.

Party affiliation?

REPUBLICAN

Any questions?

Sativan said...

Barack is Cannabinoid Deficient! Read this post and judge for yourself.
http://yeswecannabis.blogspot.com/2009/01/is-obama-cannibinoid-deficient.html

Fourpoint said...

Oh No! Not Speed Limit 55 again, we don't need a step backwards. A gret group that fights this stuff is National Motorists Assn. I'm a life member...
Fred
www.fourpointreport.blogspot.com

Grace Explosion said...

Actually, I'm a social conservative. I really like Governor Palin. I don't smoke pot. I don't think it's wise or prudent, but I think it crosses over into fascism for the State to focus on marijuana. I would not be for the legalization of harder drugs - but I would be for the legalization of marijuana. Alcohol is legal - and look at all the legal prescribed drugs that are worse than marijuana imo and are to alter moods.

I don't think I'd "push" for marijuana legalization, but I would vote for it as a citizen if asked to vote to legalize it, I think. Someone would have to make a compelling argument against it - I think it's ridiculous to ruin the lives of young men and women over something that really is not that harmful, imo, and I think has probably been quite common since the 60's. The people have the right to make their own laws. And I don't think "potheads" are equal to "crackheads" - and I don't think people should go to jail or face other persecutions for smoking pot. That's my opinion.

So, I'm a conservative right wing person who would probably vote for legalization of marijuana (but not harder drugs). Someone would have to make a compelling argument to prove to me that's a wrong position. I'd need to see facts that would dissuade me - and maybe they exist. Not sure. It hasn't been a "fight" I've seen any argument on. I'd say to decriminalize it and the raids where states have made it legal is just out and out wrong, imo.

Paul said...

Eric,

Please get down off your high horse. I'm the author of the commentary you've cited and I was PLENTY critical of Obama on drug policy PRIOR to the election. For example:

http://www.alternet.org/election08/97810

Obama's Biden Pick Signals 'More of the Same' Stupid Drug Policies

By Paul Armentano, AlterNet. Posted September 6, 2008.

I mean, fer Christ sakes, Obama flipped on his decrim stance prior to being elected and his VP is the modern architect of the drug war.

Further, while Dana R. has been outspoken in favor of medical marijuana, it is absurd to imply he's the STRONGEST advocate in Congress (next to Ron Paul) for marijuana "legalization." Rohrabacher was not even a co-sponsor of HR 5843, "An Act to Remove Federal Penalties for the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults."

That measure was sponsored by Dem. Barney Frank. In fact, ALL of the co-sponsors of that bill sans Ron Paul were Dems.

Seriously, I don't know how anyone can even play this partisan game anymore re: the WOD. The drug war would not have been initiated, expanded, and continued all of these decades were it not a BIPARTISAN effort. It's not a D or R issue; it's a D and R issue. That simple.

Publius said...

But Eric, they'll lift the jackboot when we're freed from the shackles of Capitalism, right? -HEh. Any liberal surprised by this is stupid -- Obama didn't campaign on state's right's for medical marijuana. Bush did, and he broke that promise. Obama is a consistent authoritarian.

You're wrong about MA, it decriminalized personal pot possession (MA does not have legalized medical marijuana) - possession of under one ounce is a $100 civil fine. The fine for smoking Tobacco in a Boston hotel room? $200

Eric Dondero said...

Grace, that makes you officially a "libertarian-conservative," and thus a very, very welcome member of the Libertarian Republican family, (although we are technically the reverse conservative-libertarians.)

Thanks Grace! You rock!!!

Eric Dondero said...

Paul, thanks for the comments.

Publius, good points. Yes, I erred somewhat on MA.

Eric Dondero said...

Paul, thanks for the comments.

Publius, good points. Yes, I erred somewhat on MA.

Eric Dondero said...

Paul, gotta quick question for ya? What makes you think Democrats will be friends of marijuana smokers, when they're rampaging all over the United States for bans on tobacco, everywhere?

John said...

Eric,

The WOD is not going to go away, no candidate for national office is ever going to support legalization, not even Sarah, I'm sorry to say. I don't expect to see it my lifetime, public opinion is just too tilted by the images we see every day on TV and in the popular culture as a whole. I can't even hire an accountant these days without them having to go through mandatory testing.

I, myself, am disabled, but continue to work. I've had numerous and massive back surgeries that make it almost impossible for me to walk. My doctor would prefer that I use marijuana (eaten, not smoked) to alieviate pain, but even though Cali has legalized medical marijuana, he fears retribution by the Feds if he prescribes it. Instead, I live on prescrption opiates, (Oxicontin, Percocet) to get out of bed and function. We have discussed the fact that I am completely dependent on them now, and always will be. If I were to have to go off them, I would be facing months of withdrawal.

This ban on medical marijuana is a joke, but unfortunately, the joke is on me and every other person who could find relief from pain, nausea, etc.

Paul said...

Eric,

To respond to your inquiry... It's not about Dems in Congress being 'friends' of marijuana law reform; more accurately, they are simply less worse than Repubs on the issue. Just look at the numbers:

Act to Remove Federal Penalties for the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults (Introduced in House)[H.R.5843.IH]

Rep Baldwin, Tammy [WI-2] - 5/20/2008
Rep Blumenauer, Earl [OR-3] - 6/24/2008
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 4/24/2008
Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] - 6/25/2008
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 6/5/2008
Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14] - 4/17/2008
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13] - 9/16/2008

7 D, 1 R

Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act (Introduced in House)[H.R.5842.IH]

Rep Baldwin, Tammy [WI-2] - 5/20/2008
Rep Berkley, Shelley [NV-1] - 6/5/2008
Rep Blumenauer, Earl [OR-3] - 6/24/2008
Rep Capuano, Michael E. [MA-8] - 9/16/2008
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 7/31/2008
Rep DeFazio, Peter A. [OR-4] - 5/1/2008
Rep Farr, Sam [CA-17] - 4/17/2008
Rep Filner, Bob [CA-51] - 5/19/2008
Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. [NY-22] - 4/17/2008
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 6/5/2008
Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] - 6/25/2008
Rep Lofgren, Zoe [CA-16] - 6/5/2008
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 6/5/2008
Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] - 9/17/2008
Rep Norton, Eleanor Holmes [DC] - 7/8/2008
Rep Olver, John W. [MA-1] - 9/16/2008
Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14] - 4/17/2008
Rep Rohrabacher, Dana [CA-46] - 4/17/2008
Rep Rothman, Steven R. [NJ-9] - 6/11/2008
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13] - 9/16/2008
Rep Thompson, Mike [CA-1] - 9/16/2008
Rep Waxman, Henry A. [CA-30] - 9/23/2008
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] - 5/15/2008

21 D, 2 R

Of course, this is all moot as Congress is NOT going to move on this issue. However, many state legislatures are moving in the right direction. Oh, but there's that R thing happening:

CT -- medical mj bill passed the legislature in 2007, vetoed by Repub. Gov. Rell

RI -- medical mj bill passed the legislature in 2007, vetoed by Repub. Gov. Carcieri (veto later overridden by legislature)

MN -- medical marijuana bill passed the Senate and awaiting House floor vote in 2008, bill tabled after Repub. Gov. Pawlenty says he will veto it

HI -- medical marijuana expansion bill passed the legislature in 2008, vetoed by Repub. Gov Lingle

CA -- hemp farming bill passed the legislature in 2008, vetoed by Repub. Gov Shwartzenegger

NM -- medical marijuana bill passed by the legislature in 2007, signed by the Gov into law (Dem Bill Richardson)

Once again, this is not to say that Dems are great or even good on this issue. Like I said, the drug war does not fit into a standard R v D paradigm. But that is not to say that R's haven't been standing in the way of certain small steps toward reform in recent years, as the examples above illustrate.

bint alshamsa said...

John,

I'm in a similar situation. Multiple back and chest surgeries make it necessary for me to use prescription drugs for pain. My oncologist told me that I'd probably have to be on them for the rest of my life but I didn't believe him. After decreasing my opiate dosage over a period of years, I reached the point where I just couldn't lower it any more without being in too much pain to be able to function. If I use enough to actually relieve the pain, then I'd be too drugged up to be able to get anything done.

Some of my friends in my cancer support group use marijuana. These aren't irresponsible teens getting blazed and sitting around in their parents' basement. These are moms and dads who are just trying to do what it takes to be able to make it through the day. A few years ago, I almost died when I stopped being able to keep food down. I lost so much weight that my adolescent daughter and I were the same weight. I really wanted to try marijuana to see if it would help but I felt really conflicted about it because of the legal and ethical issues involved with breaking the law.

As a parent, I want to teach my daughter not to engage in illegal behavior. At the same time, I had no desire to die just because the prescription meds weren't working. The drug laws leave a lot of disabled people in untenable situations. It's a shame that the government doesn't give a damn about families like ours.

"Radical" Russ said...

As an Obama supporter and podcaster for NORML, I may surprise you by stating that I am not surprised by Obama's marijuana stance at all. When fellow progressives were overjoyed that Obama said "I inhaled, frequently, that was the point," I reminded them that Bill Clinton inhaled (c'mon now, Bill, fess up) and arrested 4.5 million pot smokers. (To be fair, George W. Bush arrested 5.4 million.)

Dems, if anything, are worse on the marijuana issue for fear of being labeled "soft on crime". And Obama, stuck as he is being The First Black President, can't be thought of as pro-legalization or anything but a status-quo centrist for fear of the backlash. And when you've candidly admitted your pot and coke using youth, you have to play the "I regret my youthful indiscretions" card so hard you become tougher on drugs than a non-user.

Still, I cannot regret my Obama vote, as a vote for "1000 years in Iraq" McCain and "In what respect, Charlie?" Palin was so much more terrifying than Obama. Obama/Biden may keep the anti-marijuana status quo, but McCain/Palin would have ratcheted up the drug war. (This guy would've fought 1000 years in Iraq, no telling how long he'd fight potheads.)

It doesn't really matter, though, because no real marijuana law reform will happen from the top down. Like prohibition, first instituted in 1909 in El Paso, Texas, then slowly creeping up from the South and Southwest state-by-state, until it became federal law, the end of prohibition will also happen from the ground up, from cities like Seattle and Oakland virtually legalizing marijuana, then slowly creeping to the center from the West Coast and Northeast, until finally prohibition becomes overturned federally.

Truly, at the federal level, we are in the wilderness. Like our Israel policy, marijuana policy is the only issue for which the public is split 50/50 (on legalizing, 75%+ support for decrim and medmj), and 98% of Republicans and 99% of Democrats are solidly on the other side.

And just to correct Eric Dondero - you forgot Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), sponsor of last Congress' HR5843 (with Ron Paul), and Rep. Maurice Hinchey, sponsor of the End DEA Raids amendment to the Justice Appropriations bill (with Dana Rohrbacher).

Russ Belville
Host - NORML Daily Audio Stash - stash.norml.org
Host - The Russ Belville Show - XM Satellite 167

Allan in TN said...

Part of the answer here is a Fully Informed Jury.

If juries would use the power of jury nullification to not convict people of possession or even selling marijuana, then the laws would eventually change

Meanwhile, the corrosive effect to the 4th Amendment of the "War on Drugs" (WOD) continues.

And if the WOD isn't enough for the vice squad, you could arrest someone for playing Monopoly under the law in S. Carolina.

Gary Baumgarten said...

Paul Armentano will be my guest on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com at 5 PM New York time Monday February 9.

Please go to http://www.garybaumgarten.com and click on the Join The Chat Room button to talk to him.

Thanks,

Gary